Why #GPL? "Using the #GNU GPL will require that all the released improved versions be free software. This means you can avoid the risk of having to compete with a proprietary modified version of your own work." More at https://u.fsf.org/3kr
From the preamble of the #GNU #GPL: '[T]he GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. [...]' https://u.fsf.org/3kz
At the FSF, the licensing team is often asked, "What is the difference between an 'aggregate' and other kinds of 'modified versions'?" Read the answer on our #GNUGPLFAQ: https://u.fsf.org/3tx #GPL
What if I discover a possible violation of the GPL? "You should report it. First, check the facts as best you can. Then tell the publisher or copyright holder of the specific GPL-covered program." Read the full answer https://u.fsf.org/3ks #GNUGPLFAQ #GPL
Does the #GPL require that source code of modified versions be posted to the public? "The GPL does not require you to release your modified version, or any part of it. You are free to [...]" Read the full answer at https://u.fsf.org/3kt
What does it mean to say that two licenses are "compatible?" Read the answer on our #GPLFAQ page: https://u.fsf.org/3wl #GPL
What does it mean to say that two licenses are "compatible?" Read the answer on our #GPLFAQ page: https://u.fsf.org/3wl #GPL
→ Une #intelligence #artificielle libre est-elle possible ?
https://linuxfr.org/news/une-intelligence-artificielle-libre-est-elle-possible#toc-le-r%25C3%25A9seau-de-neurones
« Posons-nous un instant la question : qu’est-ce que le #code #source d’un réseau de #neurones ? […] La #GPL fournit une définition : le code source est la forme de l’œuvre privilégiée pour effectuer des #modifications. Dans cette acception, le code source d’un réseau de neurones serait l’#algorithme d’entraînement, le réseau de neurones de départ et le #corpus sur lequel le réseau a été entraîné »
#licesing question.
People share (a)gpl code on github. Github is not available everywhere (even read access I think).
Does that break the GPL?
"...must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software"
(AGPL 3, section 13)
Have questions about possible violations of #GNU licenses? We have answers! Check out all the questions and answers on our FAQ page at https://u.fsf.org/3kx #GPL
What if I discover a possible violation of the GPL? "You should report it. First, check the facts as best you can. Then tell the publisher or copyright holder of the specific GPL-covered program." Read the full answer https://u.fsf.org/3ks #GNUGPLFAQ #GPL
How do I use GNU licenses for my own software? We are glad you asked! Please see our "GPL how to" page for the full answer and thank you for making the ethical choice! https://u.fsf.org/2b5 #GPL
Don T3rr0r 
@t3rr0rz0n3 Three of those apply equally to the #GNU #GPL, so not sure what point you are trying to make.
The GNU GPL does not disallow use in proprietary software, there is no obligation to share anything, and companies (and anyone) can profit without giving back.
Using the MIT license might seem like a good idea, but:
Allows your code to be used in proprietary software No obligation to share improvements Companies can profit without giving back Doesn’t protect user freedom
If you want your code to stay free: use GPL.
As far as communication goes, I really liked #bitmessage which failed, in my opinion, because it was implemented as a GUI application rather than a library. And then there was #tox which failed because it was #gpl licensed rather than #lgpl. And that's where #deltachat comes in with the almost instant, hassle-free, on-boarding and true #e2ee. Understanding we have no access to whatsapp, customers are quick to install #deltachat and avoid all the drama.
What if I discover a possible violation of the GPL? "You should report it. First, check the facts as best you can. Then tell the publisher or copyright holder of the specific GPL-covered program." Read the full answer https://u.fsf.org/3ks #GNUGPLFAQ #GPL
We're gonna be doing one thing, and one thing only. Killing @ubuntu.
Oh vaya, si que el tema Ubuntu + Rust, si que va traer cola para rato. Licencias, GPL/MIT,. ¿Generara cambios radicales en distintas aplicaciones coreutils (GNU)? ¿Porque no usar Rust, manteniendo las licencias GPL actuales?
Lo más seguro, distros basadas en Ubuntu, tendrán que continuar la ola. ¿Debian como reaccionara,...?
Sin duda estara de candela. Atentos.
+ 
#